I write this posting because I felt that I really need to say something to this world about “inequality”, “equality” and also “happiness”
In my last post I have explain how “unequal” society may brings in happiness to the rural people.
I am conscious that the capitalism system is not the system that taught people about wealthy to become happy. what I am trying to mean is that capitalism philosophy had brought people to think like such. Why do people want free market? People want free market because they want to increase trade and bring in profit. Why do we need to bring in profit that is to gain wealth and be happy. the whole world now is in the stage of capitalism economy system. Liberalization and privatization, this was to increase trade and economy interest of the nation to gain wealth. Every body now preach in such a economy philosophy. That why I said that the system will taught people to be wealthy in order to be happy.
In here I have to argue that education was never being neutral, maybe this kind of neutrality may exists in the British where the education is the most advance in this world. But other nation like Malaysia, Japan (their history text book controversy) had very strong bias in their history text book. Hence education was never neutral.
Karl Marx say that “the state exists because there is class existed where there are people exploit and people being exploited” According to Karl Marx in order to be equal people should progressed to Communism with the abolishment of the state by creating a no class, no property society. why does Karl Marx want to do this? What wrong with capitalism and the state that he hate so much? The answer may lie in the exploitation of the proletariat worker by the bourgeoisie master, which he had seen in the time when he is in British. So he try like anyone else to create equality society that was no class, and property.
On the other hand
Rousseau maybe the forefather of the democracy value emphasis on equality and liberty. But the problem I lies here is that how does equality exists with liberty? This world most of the democracy nation is liberty in nature like British and the America, but why does they didn’t reached equality? UK, US and France had being preaching this value since long time ago, where they are still people living in poverty? People have gone so far in preaching the value of liberty and equality that they eventually force minority to get into the global system, as I explain in my last post. this had cause them to be unhappy because that is not they wanted.
Hence no matter how government try to make equality to exists, it will never exist. No matter in Marx way nor it Rousseau way.
Unequal it may seem, but this maybe the perfect society.
In my last post I have explain how “unequal” society may brings in happiness to the rural people.
I am conscious that the capitalism system is not the system that taught people about wealthy to become happy. what I am trying to mean is that capitalism philosophy had brought people to think like such. Why do people want free market? People want free market because they want to increase trade and bring in profit. Why do we need to bring in profit that is to gain wealth and be happy. the whole world now is in the stage of capitalism economy system. Liberalization and privatization, this was to increase trade and economy interest of the nation to gain wealth. Every body now preach in such a economy philosophy. That why I said that the system will taught people to be wealthy in order to be happy.
In here I have to argue that education was never being neutral, maybe this kind of neutrality may exists in the British where the education is the most advance in this world. But other nation like Malaysia, Japan (their history text book controversy) had very strong bias in their history text book. Hence education was never neutral.
Karl Marx say that “the state exists because there is class existed where there are people exploit and people being exploited” According to Karl Marx in order to be equal people should progressed to Communism with the abolishment of the state by creating a no class, no property society. why does Karl Marx want to do this? What wrong with capitalism and the state that he hate so much? The answer may lie in the exploitation of the proletariat worker by the bourgeoisie master, which he had seen in the time when he is in British. So he try like anyone else to create equality society that was no class, and property.
On the other hand
Rousseau maybe the forefather of the democracy value emphasis on equality and liberty. But the problem I lies here is that how does equality exists with liberty? This world most of the democracy nation is liberty in nature like British and the America, but why does they didn’t reached equality? UK, US and France had being preaching this value since long time ago, where they are still people living in poverty? People have gone so far in preaching the value of liberty and equality that they eventually force minority to get into the global system, as I explain in my last post. this had cause them to be unhappy because that is not they wanted.
Hence no matter how government try to make equality to exists, it will never exist. No matter in Marx way nor it Rousseau way.
Unequal it may seem, but this maybe the perfect society.
No comments:
Post a Comment